The blog of Academe Magazine. Opinions published here do not necessarily represent the policies of the AAUP.
In his column “How to Get a Job at Google,” Thomas Friedman talks about the views of Lazlo Bock, Google’s head of hiring. Those views explode the assumptions about education behind the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) that are being imposed on American schools and that will continue to change (if fully implemented) what college professors can expect from incoming students. Instead of coming from a regressive test-centric, skills-centric education fostered by CCSS, Bock wants to see candidates for hire who look forward to new possibilities. He does not want to see ones who can only look back to the needs of an older era.
It’s a little puzzling that Friedman extols Bock. At the Education Writers Association national meeting in 2013, according to Patrick O’Donnell:
Friedman praised the imminent Common Core standards. He said that beyond raising expectations of students, having multiple states using the same standards will allow programmers to write materials that serve a broader audience instead of the fractured one now.
“You’re going to see a huge amount of innovation coming off the Common Core,” he predicted.
O’Donnell writes that Friedman went on to also praise Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). “’This is the beginning of a real revolution,’ he said” about them.
Well, the MOOC revolution came and went without impact… the medium will remain, but simply as another tool for teaching, not as a world-changing possibility… and CCSS, we are discovering, is focused not on innovation but on meeting the needs of 1964, certainly not on preparing students for the unknowns of the future. In his comments, Bock, without addressing either directly, makes that clear. Friedman recounts Bock’s five hiring “attributes”:
The only item on this list that is addressed (and not at all well, at that) by either the MOOC or the CCSS is the last one. Clearly, CCSS will never help anyone get a job at Google. Candidates have to prepare for that on their own, by developing the requisite skills outside of the classroom (unless, of course, we abandon CCSS).
I don’t know if Friedman is in the midst of a change of heart (I hope so, but that would be too much to expect), but it is a little odd that he is writing about Bock now, more than half-a-year after the interview he references. Last August, fellow Times columnist Paul Krugman wrote about “the entirely praiseworthy, up to now bipartisan effort to create a Common Core curriculum.” I am hoping that was the high-water mark of enthusiasm for CCSS and that since, in the face of reservations across the political spectrum and from educators at all levels (including in the universities CCSS is supposed to facilitate by better preparing entrants), the pundits, both good (Krugman) and mediocre (Friedman) are beginning to recognize the smoke and mirrors of CCSS for just what they are.
The jobs of the future cannot be prepared for by aiming to succeed on tests over material extracted from jobs (and knowledge) of the past. The best way to prepare for the future is to learn how to learn–enthusiastically and with willingness to fail and get up and try again. Unlike Bock and Google, CCSS does not understand this basic fact of contemporary life.