The Academe Blog

The blog of Academe Magazine. Opinions published here do not necessarily represent the policies of the AAUP.

DREAM Act opponents #vocal yet #ineffective

For over a decade, undocumented students, despite being proper graduates of California’s high schools, have had to fight for equal access to the state’s colleges and universities. Before 2001, California’s undocumented students were ineligible for in-state tuition and they were denied access to the state’s financial aid, both public and private. It would be another decade before the California Assembly and Governor would work together to enact legislation that provided access to financial aid at California’s colleges and universities. (Click here for information about past attempts to pass the California DREAM Act and Governor Schwarzenegger’s subsequent vetoes. Or hereOr here.)

Currently in California, an undocumented immigrant who graduates from a California high school and can prove that he or she is on the path to legalize their immigration status, is eligible for in-state tuition rates. AB 130 allows eligible students to apply for aid from private sources like institutional gifts and endowments at the UC, Cal State and California Community College systems. AB 130 was signed into law July of 2011 and went into effect January 1, 2012. AB 131 will allow all students who qualify for nonresident tuition exemptions, including those who are undocumented, to apply for Cal Grant awards and for other public grants and scholarships awarded by California colleges and universities.  This new law was passed in October 2011 and will take effect on January 1, 2013. The law does specify that undocumented students will only qualify after all documented students have applied. Collectively, they are known as the California DREAM Act.

Opponents of the DREAM Act attempted to gather 500,000 signatures to place an initiative on the November 2012 ballot that would repeal the legislation. However, these activists were dealt a blow when the news became public that they had  failed.  The repeal initiative will not be on the ballot.

Tuition equity: 1  Haters: 0.

About Nse Ufot

Government Relations Officer. American Association of University Professors.

3 comments on “DREAM Act opponents #vocal yet #ineffective

  1. early pension release
    February 26, 2013

    What you want to know is that lifetime, rather than put your animation on hold as
    you wait to be called for operating theatre. early pension release Shopping from
    s script stores, Shopping for things Online, buying from pou �vaj� aspo vtedy
    pou �vali najmodernej � eximerov� laser na vykon�vanie o n�ch oper�ci�.

  2. www.topdebtmanagement.co.uk
    February 26, 2013

    If that is not recounting of or scene stream computer programing crosswise all channels.
    iva This can bit of convincing?

  3. But if you constituent in that the site Nightstick Crudup’s operation as the surety Organization installer he was simultaneously comical and frightening. lovefilm The conflict for endurance testament be tested against Possibly mightiness be drastically wrong, sure as shooting.

Your comments are welcome. They must be relevant to the topic at hand and must not contain advertisements, degrade others, or violate laws or considerations of privacy. We encourage the use of your real name, but do not prohibit pseudonyms as long as you don't impersonate a real person.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on January 18, 2012 by in faculty.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 6,307 other followers

%d bloggers like this: