POSTED BY HANK REICHMAN
The following statement was issued today.
The AAUP and the AAUP Collective Bargaining Congress have never endorsed or supported a candidate for president of the United States or otherwise engaged in partisan political activity on the national level. For over one hundred years the AAUP has vigilantly defended the professional rights and the academic freedom of all those who teach in higher education, irrespective of their political or other views, popular or unpopular, leftist or rightist. It would be foolish, however, to deny that most college and university faculty members did not support the election of Donald Trump. Many no doubt fear that his election threatens some of the core institutions of our democracy and may be the greatest threat to academic freedom since the McCarthy period.
Certainly, Trump’s campaign has already threatened academic freedom. His remarks about minorities, immigrants, and women have on some campuses had a chilling effect on the rights of students and faculty members to speak out. At some events Trump held on university campuses, students who opposed him said they were harassed or threatened. His call for an “ideological screening test” for admission to the United States could make it difficult for universities to attract students and scholars from other countries and to engage in the international exchange of ideas so vital to academic freedom. In addition, Trump has vowed to appoint Supreme Court justices like Antonin Scalia, who would cripple public employee unions by overturning their established right to collect fees from the nonmembers they must serve. With more than half the faculty now barred from the protections of tenure, unionization may be the only remaining protection for academic freedom available to those instructors. Lastly, Trump’s denial of climate change and, indeed, of the validity of science itself assaults the very core of higher education’s search for knowledge.
But the problems facing higher education today and the growing assault on the professionalism and freedoms of faculty members over the past several decades can hardly be attributed to the results of a single election. Many of these problems stem from ill-conceived policies developed and implemented on a bipartisan basis. As a candidate, Donald Trump did not propound clear and detailed policy proposals for higher education. We therefore urge him and his supporters in the Congress to listen to the voices of all faculty members and other educational leaders and endorse policies aimed at restoring our great higher education system as a common good for all Americans, while protecting the academic freedom and shared governance that made our colleges and universities the envy of the world.
We in the AAUP and AAUP-CBC pledge to redouble our efforts to
• Oppose the privatization of our public higher education system and fight for higher education as a common good, accessible and affordable to all.
• Oppose discrimination on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, religion or national origin and fight for an equitable and welcoming educational environment in which all can freely and safely learn, discuss, differ, debate, and grow.
• Oppose attacks on unions and the economic security of college and university faculty and staff and fight for expanding and strengthening the rights of all faculty members– tenure-track, contingent, and graduate employees–to organize and bargain collectively.
• Oppose violations of academic freedom and of the broader rights to free expression in the academic community and fight for strengthened protections for and renewed commitment to the principles of the 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure and the 1966 Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities.
We recognize that faculty members are divided by discipline, by institutional type, by employment status, as well as by race, religion, gender, and politics. But now is the time for us to unite, organize, and fight, not only for ourselves but for the common good, not only by ourselves but with allies both inside and outside of academia.
If you’re not already a member, please join us in this fight.
The future is still in our hands. There is nothing to be gained and much to be lost from resignation or despair.
Rudy Fichtenbaum, AAUP president
Howard Bunsis, AAUP-CBC chair
Henry Reichman, chair of Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure
But you support attacks (literally) on journalists by rabid faculty at Missouri.
Maybe you can call for some “muscle” to take care of Trump.
Seems to be the way the AAUP and those it supports operate.
1) The student in question was not a journalist. He had no journalistic assignment at the time, nor has he had one since. And there was only one student with his own video camera, not multiple journalists.
2) The AAUP did not defend the faculty member’s actions. Here is what we wrote in the introduction to our report: “The purpose of this report is not to defend Professor Click’s November 9 actions, for which she has apologized publicly and repeatedly, nor to assert that those actions should have been protected under principles of academic freedom. As discussed below, opinions vary greatly about whether Professor Click’s alleged misconduct warranted dismissal and even about whether her actions constituted misconduct at all. This report is primarily concerned with two issues: whether Professor Click was afforded the protections of academic due process called for under AAUP-recommended standards and whether the action taken against her was the result of overreach by the university’s governing board and of inappropriate political interference, by members of the Missouri legislature, into the university’s disciplinary process and into the university’s affairs more generally.”
3) Would you apply the same standard to the abusive treatment of actual journalists at Mr. Trump’s rallies? The violence, both verbal and physical, demonstrated there far exceeds any that occurred on the Missouri campus a year ago.
4) I don’t know why I am bothering to respond to someone willing only to identify as “Mr. T,” since I seriously doubt that you are the actual “Mr. T” of TV fame and more likely a lonely crank half his size.
I personally love the snark of (4), but would note that it violates the guidelines against degrading others.
I’ve been the target of worse (and I’m not anonymous) but I guess you’re right. My apologies, Mr. T.
I would include “disability” in the pledge to oppose discrimination based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, and national origin …
Fine with me!
And of course, I’d include “age” as well in this pledge…
Also fine with me, especially in light of my own advancing age.
Pingback: AAUP Chapters Speak Out After Election | ACADEME BLOG