Seven Years an Adjunct: Part I

BY APRIL FORD

I’ve been on the job market since January. That’s no time at all in academe time, and already two-thirds of the applications I’ve sent out, at an average of ten per week, have met form-letter deaths. My favorite rejection so far addresses me as “Sir Ford,” and closes with “good luck out there.” All that’s missing is an exclamation point. I continue to check AWP, HigherEdJobs, and MLA daily, but now just the idea of relocating to another state to teach a 4/4 load (plus advising, plus service) for a year has lost its appeal. Prior to January, I dabbled in the market every spring and fall, in hopes of landing a fellowship or short-term lectureship at some recognized institution; I wanted experience, stimulation, and, yes, respite from teaching section after section of Introduction to Creative Writing at my current place of employment. I’ve become something of a General Education specialist, you might say, which isn’t to say I don’t enjoy teaching 100-level courses, but when that’s all my department can offer me, and when a search committee at another college asks me during a phone interview why I haven’t taught any upper-level courses in seven years…

Before January, I didn’t need to be on the job market. Now I do. I’m in the process of getting divorced, which will cost me, among other things, the “privileged” adjunct status I’ve held as the spouse of a tenured professor. In a few months I’ll lose my health, dental, and vision benefits as well, so when I say I’ve been on the market since January, I mean I’ve been on it as hard as anyone desperate to sustain a teaching career in academia (don’t get me started on the supposed perks, like living-wage pay). It’s been tough on my eyes, spending hours upon hours completing generic online job portal forms in order to gain access to the actual applications, but what’s been dragging me down the most is the realization that seven years of teaching mostly introductory-level courses for the same institution is proving to be a blemish rather than an embellishment on my resumé. The relentlessly positive course evaluations and personal comments from students, high praise from colleagues and anyone else who has seen me in action, and the Pushcart Prize recently awarded to my fiction don’t seem to be keeping me afloat in the candidate slush pile, either.

If it sounds like I’m trumpeting my accomplishments, damn right I am. But I’m not overplaying a single note. I’ve worked tirelessly to succeed as an author while also being a thorough and accessible professor to multiple and large groups of writing students every semester, and I contribute regularly to the literary community at-large and to my campus community (I have served this latter freely and for free since 2010); and by not getting out of adjunctemia sooner, by not pursuing the “true” terminal degree for artists seeking stable teaching positions in higher education, I have quite possibly committed career suicide. I wish I could have foreseen this eventuality, not held out hope that my department Chairs and colleagues would finally get the okay from administration to create a full-time position for me. But maybe instead of faulting my present employer, I should fault my silly dream of having both a marriage and a career. Where might I be now if I had said “no” to an institution that doesn’t appear to value the struggles or successes of its shamefully under-compensated contingent faculty? Here’s why I am where I am now, and I apologize if you’ve heard this story before:

In 2009, my partner accepted a tenure-track job in Oneonta. We had met in Montreal, my home, and as the end of my partner’s limited-term appointment loomed before us, so did the conversation many academic couples are forced to have: So! Whose career are we going to focus on first? Being that I was an aspiring writer, and relatively unencumbered, we agreed to put my partner’s career first. I appreciated the paucity of tenure-track offers, plus I was 27 and eager for a radically new life. While my partner was off professing to the great minds of tomorrow, I could write all day in our home office, or bus to New York City to network and procure freelance gigs. My partner promised me the best possible life he could give me in a rural college town overwhelmed by bars and pizza joints, and he did magnificently; six months after I arrived in Oneonta, however, I felt isolated and unhappy, and there wasn’t a decent job prospect for me in sight. I also felt out of place among our new friends, who happened to be my spouse’s colleagues. I spent many a Friday night faculty happy hour outside, smoking by myself while the professors basked in their complaints about students and administrators, and gossiped about other professors.

Within a year of coming to Oneonta, I was teaching French language courses at the college, and pursuing a Master’s in Creative Writing (I had opted for a low-residency program so I wouldn’t have to be in a long-distance marriage). The adjuncting and MFA-ing helped me feel more connected to my partner and our social life. As the years passed and I became a published author, I gained some honors and awards for my writing, and settled into a comfortable routine of teaching two or three courses per semester (at $2700 – $3000 per 3 s.h.). I guess we all hoped this would be enough for me—until my career as a best-selling author of literary fiction kicked off, of course. My “fortuitous life,” someone once called it, as the spouse of a tenured professor, and as a writer whose partner encouraged me to put writing before revenue, meant we didn’t have to concern ourselves with my non-career prospects in academia.

No adjunct wants to come across as petulant and entitled, hurt colleagues who really have championed her, or piss off the wrong administrator. If there’s anything fortuitous about my situation now, it’s that I have this forum where I can talk openly about concerns many adjuncts feel compelled to suppress. As I mentioned earlier, the prospect of relocating for a temporary position is unappealing at this point. Maybe I’ll do a career overhaul, return to Montreal, waitress at some dive bar with black lights on its ceiling so I can have time to write the next great Canadian–American novel (which I have written, incidentally, and is presently under consideration with literary agents in Toronto and New York City). My immediate goal, the only one I have any illusion of control over, is to keep my spirits up as the rejections continue to lumber in, and share what it’s like for “terminal” adjuncts to be on the job market. Instead of being snarky about a troubling issue of national scope, I could publish stats that drive home the staggering reality that higher education in North America runs on adjuncts, but we know these numbers already, right? And right now, I have hardly enough motivation and optimism to keep myself running. aprilfordauthor.com

10 thoughts on “Seven Years an Adjunct: Part I

  1. April, the only thing that would have made your story worse is children. How many adjuncts who are women have done this, allowing themselves to be exploited because of their “silly dream” as you so aptly put it? I am on year 39 as a “career adjunct” and there are many more like us. Yes, it is a terrible system, and it is very difficult to escape the nightmare. What I suggest to my younger colleagues is to diversify following your gifts as best you can. Keep writing! But don’t depend on one abusive employer to make your life liveable. And look for an institution with a labor union so you can help people like yourself. Good luck!

    • Thanks for your response, classicalwarrior! You are spot-on about how easy it becomes to depend on an employer who isn’t invested in you. If it hadn’t been for my partner, who really did make our lives wonderful, I would have left Oneonta much sooner.

  2. Perhaps it is time that all from bachelor’s degree to post doc understood that a diploma, no matter how prestigious is not an entry ticket to employment. Perhaps it needs to be understood that all “industries” from production work to intellectual occupations change in their demands and needs for humans to perform tasks, separate from the displacement by digitization. Perhaps it is time that the function of the traditional post secondary institution and its faculty is changing with changing needs, particularly for traditional tenure track scholars balancing teaching and research.

    Perhaps it is time that AAUP understood that it has the same problems that any other union as its membership changes with the addition of more persons such as April whose position, though in academia takes on characteristics similar to secondary faculty and the converse, secondary faculty gaining credentials and providing students with similar certification as education goes seamlessly from K to Gray and alternative certifications and programs emerge.

    And, with the emergence of “big data” employers will search, and now are searching, for qualified applicants rather than applicants searching for employers.

    • Perhaps it is time for all academics to realize that being hired into a tenure-line job has little to do with merit. For every person that is hired, there are so many other applicants who are just as qualified, if not more so. The doctorate matters, but so do masters degrees plus experience, especially in the arts and humanities.

      • This reminds me of the same issues as students trying to get into prestigious colleges and/or Ivy’s: there are more qualified students who wish to do so than possible openings. The current system relies on an opaque process, through which it is not known the criteria for acceptance.

        We are also at this time providing more PhD’s than available professorial positions. We are also in a time of predatory journals, and there are many more faculty submissions than spaces in the prestigious journals. Clearly we are in a time of flux, and it is not apparent where we may end up, but clearly with the rise of social media and machine learning, there will continue to be significant change in how education is delivered. And if education delivery becomes the only motivating force within academia, then what happens to the amazing scope of pure research that is also a responsibility of (at least the R1) these entities.

        I wish there were a simple solution to this problem, but I am afraid that there is still plenty of time before we get to there. And when we get to the solution, we may not be happy with what it is.

  3. Pingback: April Ford writes for Academe (AAUP) – Daily Bulletin | SUNY Oneonta

  4. Pingback: Seven Years an Adjunct: Part II | ACADEME BLOG

  5. April, I feel for you, and for all the others who have been trapped in adjunct-land. I received my PhD in English several decades ago, and have a crazy-quilt resume. “Why don’t you get your foot in the door, and maybe you can move to regular faculty,” urged a professor many years ago, referring to a place where I had been offered a one-year adjunct post. So I never went there. Listening to stories like yours, I recall those times and wonder whether I DID miss the boat. I don’t think I did. But I realized that I had to find something with a decent salary + benefits. I did, but it wasn’t in teaching. I made my salary, and kept giving papers here and there for fun (except at my own expense). In 1997 I gave a talk at NEMLA where I urged grad students to give their job search 5 years, and then to get out. I wonder if anyone listened — that was over 20 years ago. And you’re right: the US is still producing more PhDs than there are jobs. At this point, I would like to see a NATIONAL STRIKE of all contingent faculty, so it would be clear who does the majority of teaching on American campuses. Tuition everywhere has risen, but this only SUBSIDIZES ADMINISTRATIVE BLOAT.

    My advice: make money doing something you enjoy, even if it’s not teaching. Do something where you will be VALUED!

    • Thank you so much for reading my essay, Jane! I can’t believe it’s been a year since I wrote it…and I’m in a much better place. I ended up leaving academia, and some may so too soon, but there ended up being factors in addition to pay that influenced my final decision (such as learning some of my full-time colleagues, though supportive to my face, held disappointingly elitist, anti-adjunct views). Now, I work in literary publishing and I community writing workshops — and I’m happy. I wish happiness to you, also!

Comments are closed.