LSU Faculty Senate Censures Top Administrators in Teresa Buchanan Case

By an overwhelming 39-5 vote the Louisiana State University (LSU) Faculty Senate today (October 6) voted to censure three top administrators for their roles in the dismissal of tenured professor Teresa Buchanan for allegedly creating a hostile environment in classes with sexually explicit jokes.  LSU Baton Rouge has been on the AAUP’s list of censured institutions since 2011.  On September 2, the Association released a rare “supplementary report” on the Buchanan case, which raised several questions about the extent to which LSU followed its own policies and AAUP-approved principles of due process in its dismissal of Buchanan.

The Senate resolution, originally submitted on September 2 as well, accuses the administrators of violating academic principles related to tenure, faculty governance, and due process for dismissing Buchanan for misconduct after a faculty panel concluded that dismissal was unwarranted and that her case had been mishandled.

The administrators applied “a standard that is chilling in its breadth and ambiguity,” the resolution states, in concluding, in the absence of any named student’s complaint, that her statements in the classroom created a hostile environment and amounted to sexual harassment.  Later allegations that  Buchanan had created a hostile environment by being abusive of students similarly applied standards contrary to academic freedom, because they failed “to define what constitutes a consistently hostile environment” and appeared to regard the administration “as the sole guardian of student welfare.”

The three censured administrators are F. King Alexander, the university’s president; Stuart R. Bell, its provost; and Damon Andrew, the dean of its College of Human Sciences and Education.

Kevin L. Cope, the Faculty Senate’s president and a member of the AAUP Council, said a faculty panel that investigated the case over the past month had concluded it had been mishandled and that Buchanan did not deserve to lose her job, endorsing the conclusions of an earlier faculty panel that weighed in before she was fired. He said the Faculty Senate disagrees with the administration’s characterization of the circumstances that led to the dismissal and its assertions that Buchanan’s conduct violated federal anti-discrimination laws.

The Faculty Senate resolution urges the administrators to rescind Buchanan’s dismissal.

The following is the text of the resolution:


Introduced at the request of Cecil Eubanks, James Garand, Robert Hogan, Pamela Monroe, Lillian Bridwell-Bowles, Brooks Ellwood, Carl Freedman, Petra Hendry, Dominique Homberger, Stuart Irvine, Patrick McGee, Richard Moreland, John Protevi, A. R. P. “Ravi” Rau, and George Strain

Affirming that an environment of free and fearless inquiry is the cornerstone of academic freedom and a great university, as it is necessary for sustaining received truths and discovering new insights;

Believing that the principles of academic freedom, so essential for teaching and research, include toleration of what we might find offensive, as well as of what might challenge our principles both in substance and style of expression;

Recognizing that great universities have in place three significant measures to ensure the continued observance of academic freedom: Tenure; faculty governance; and due process;

Convinced that all three measures have been violated in the case of Associate Professor Teresa Buchanan;

Aware that the standards initially used by the LSU’s administration to justify the termination of tenure and dismissal for cause of Associate Professor Teresa Buchanan were the creation of a hostile environment and consequent sexual harassment through the use of vulgar language, even though it is not clear that any specific individual brought such charges;

Alarmed by a standard that is as chilling in its breadth and ambiguity as it is absurd in its apparent connection to sexual harassment;

Further aware of a second set of standards, announced in the aftermath of national and international outrage over the actions by LSU’s administration, which based the dismissal of Associate Professor Buchanan on having “created a consistently hostile and abusive environment in the classroom;”

Convinced that this second set of standards is equally contrary to academic freedom as it reveals that LSU’s administration regards itself as the sole guardian of student welfare and is unable to define what constitutes a consistently hostile environment;

Noting further that a faculty committee, chosen to hear the case of Associate Professor Terry Buchanan, unanimously recommended that she be censured for specific behaviors, but decided that removal is not warranted and found that the procedural actions by LSU’s administration were flawed;

Deeply concerned that LSU’s administration ignored the recommendations of its own faculty committee and created a second set of standards that were not part of the initial charges against Associate Professor Buchanan;

Emphasizing that once the LSU administration decided to pursue charges against Associate Professor Buchanan its most egregious violation of due process was its failure to follow the guidelines of PM-35 and the procedure required by PS-109, both of which mandate a specific iterative process by which faculty behavior and/or performance is reviewed in a context of remediation designed to salvage both the faculty member’s career and the University’s investment in long-serving faculty;

Concluding that the violation of tenure, the creation and implementation of vague and chilling standards of discourse that violate all precepts of free inquiry and speech, the failure to follow faculty counsel in these matters, and the outright abrogation of proper due process by LSU’s administration have placed the LSU community in a state of confusion and outrage about the lack of commitment of LSU’s administration to an environment of freedom of inquiry and speech.

Be it therefore resolved: That LSU Chancellor-President F. King Alexander, Provost Stuart Bell, and Dean Damon Andrew of the College of Human Sciences and Education be censured for their failure to adhere to due process standards in faculty review proceedings and for their pursuit of confusing, dangerous, and untenable standards for dismissal of a tenured faculty member at Louisiana State University. And

Be it further resolved: That the Faculty Senate requests of LSU’s administration that the decision in the case of Associate Professor Teresa Buchanan shall be reversed and all necessary and continuing matters related to her case be considered in a proper PM-35/PS-109 review process

6 thoughts on “LSU Faculty Senate Censures Top Administrators in Teresa Buchanan Case

  1. I wonder what this is really about. On some accounts I’ve read, some of the K-12 schools in and around East Baton Rouge Parish were no longer willing to work with Professor Buchanan.

    Am also wondering whether anybody gets to censure the Faculty Senate.

    • This is really about due process. Unfortunately, the LSU administration continues to claim that all “the facts” are not known but that it can’t reveal those “facts,” including to Prof. Buchanan. Hence the sort of innuendo and rumor that your comment repeats. If LSU has evidence that they have withheld from both Prof. Buchanan and the now two faculty committees that have investigated the case, they are in violation of not only AAUP principles and their own policies, but also of fundamental principles of fairness — the right of the accused to respond to accusations and the right to a fair hearing. As for censuring the Senate, the LSU administration has responded to the resolution, to which response LSU Senate Chair Kevin Cope has eloquently replied here:

  2. Mr. Foster’s comments and questions are welcome. The LSU Faculty Senate does not pretend to know what took place in nearby K-12 systems, but it does require that evidence from outside sources be presented in an orderly fashion that allows the defending party to answer the charges. It is also important to understand that K-12 systems in Louisiana labor under heavy restraints with regard to free speech and curriculum development. Teachers are not allowed to critique but must rather teach creationism, for one example. It is very easy for a person to run into trouble in our public school systems even if only doing what mos consider to be the proper duty of a teach. As for censuring the Faculty Senate: anyone may persuade and LSU Faculty Senator to introduce a resolution, including a resolution of self-criticism. Mr. Foster is welcome to visit Louisiana and persuade a Faculty Senator to advance such a resolution.

  3. Pingback: Congratulations to Kevin Cope! | The Academe Blog

  4. Pingback: Lawsuit Filed in Teresa Buchanan Case | The Academe Blog

  5. Pingback: From Whence the Danger? Left? Right? Both? | ACADEME BLOG

Your comments are welcome. They must be relevant to the topic at hand and must not contain advertisements, degrade others, or violate laws or considerations of privacy. We encourage the use of your real name, but do not prohibit pseudonyms as long as you don’t impersonate a real person.