Faculty in the Networked Public Sphere

BY KELLY HAND

“Can social media cause revolution?” Adeline Koh asks this question in her May–June Academe article, “Imagined Communities, Social Media, and the Faculty.” Countering critics who see online engagement with politics and social issues as a form of ineffectual “slacktivism,” she provides a theoretical framework for understanding the potential of social media to create new discourses and challenge the status quo.

networksblogMarkOlsenCCby2.0Building on German philosopher Jürgen Habermas’s notion of the public sphere—as a product of the medium of print and its contributions to the development of democracy—Koh calls the Internet a “networked public sphere.” She uses political scientist Benedict Anderson’s concept of imagined communities—political communities generated by particular forms of media—to argue that social media empower us to move beyond the passive consumption encouraged by traditional media.

Koh discusses the implications of social media for faculty, who can use the Internet to share and disseminate their research without the time, space, and cost constraints of conventional publishing. Turning her attention to postcolonial studies, she offers examples of collaborative projects that demonstrate the value of unfettered academic exchanges, yet she also argues that postcolonial studies can help us to understand social media and “digital knowledge hierarchies and networks.” With an audience of students who have grown up with the Internet, faculty can’t ignore the importance of the networked public sphere.

Articles from the current and past issues of Academe are available online. AAUP members receive a subscription to the magazine, available both by mail and as a downloadable PDF, as a benefit of membership.

2 thoughts on “Faculty in the Networked Public Sphere

  1. From Wikopedia, Lee Anne Fenell’s statement of “lin” Ostrom’s Law:
    “A resource arrangement that works in practice can work in theory”

    Tjere are academics that are actually publishing in more public media rather than going the pub/perish route, at least for some of their papers.

    With over 2.5 million papers in the science/tech refereed journals, and the changing nature of academia, there is much to think about here

Your comments are welcome. They must be relevant to the topic at hand and must not contain advertisements, degrade others, or violate laws or considerations of privacy. We encourage the use of your real name, but do not prohibit pseudonyms as long as you don't impersonate a real person.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s