What Mitch Daniels Doesn’t Know about History

By Michael Kazin

Michael Kazin’s critique of Howard Zinn was cited by Purdue President Mitch Daniels in response to the controversy over Gov. Daniels’ emails attacking Zinn. Kazin, a professor of history at Georgetown University and co-editor of Dissent magazine, wrote this reaction to the issue.

I don’t know if Daniels should be fired, but I agree that he should be roundly condemned for his attempts to stop students from reading Zinn’s big book and for calling Zinn a liar, whose work is comparable to the Protocols (a purposeful fiction depicted as fact) or Lysenkoism (bad science, motivated by dogmatic materialism, which set back Soviet agriculture for many years).

I don’t think much of Zinn’s interpretation of US history, it’s true. But it’s an interpretation, which like any serious work of history, chooses to emphasize certain themes and details in order to make a larger argument. I would be unhappy if Zinn’s book were the only or even the main text in a high-school or college history class (as I understand is sometimes the case). But chapters of it can be quite useful if contrasted with alternative interpretations.

When Daniels accuses Zinn of being a “biased writer,” he just shows how little he understands about how history is now and has always been written. Every historian has a point of view about whichever portion of the past they choose to study. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t be writing about it in the first place. Zinn’s point of view is more driven by a desire to inspire his fellow leftists, instead of to make them think about the complexities of the past, than I would like. But I could list many other works of history — by conservatives, liberals, and radicals — which were also written to advance a political cause.

6 thoughts on “What Mitch Daniels Doesn’t Know about History

  1. Thank you Professor Kazin for a wonderful essay. As a Purdue Alum, I am worried that this already conservative school will be less and less academically free. One problem when STEM education is pushed on the population, fewer and fewer people have the background and tools to successfully participate in democracy. If Mitch Daniels starts a movement from his pulpit to reduce the number of electives offered to scientists and engineers, you will know which way he is heading.

  2. Pingback: LA Hump Day Links: July 24, 2013 | The Liberal Artist

  3. Pingback: Ron Radosh » 92 Professors Go After Mitch Daniels, and Embarrass Themselves!

  4. Pingback: Zinn/Daniels From A Former Leftie Who Understands | Left, Right, and Centered

  5. Boy, would Socrates have fun with this… So you say history is important for establishing good civic judgment? So you said Zinn is a bad historian? And if it’s bad history, does it produce bad judgment? Now this elected ruler, Daniels, wants to diminish the use of Zinn in teacher ed? …and so on… and there would be a place where Socrates would ask Kazin what it means to “roundly condemn” someone, and whether he’s done that to people in his own area of expertise, and on what basis… ….and on and on.

  6. Pingback: Historians Defend Howard Zinn Against a Former Governor’s Critique | Ad Jet

Your comments are welcome. They must be relevant to the topic at hand and must not contain advertisements, degrade others, or violate laws or considerations of privacy. We encourage the use of your real name, but do not prohibit pseudonyms as long as you don't impersonate a real person.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s