Saida Grundy’s Tweets: The Institutional Response

What follows is an open letter from the President Robert A. Brown of Boston University in response to the controversy surrounding “anti-White” tweets made by incoming assistant professor of African-American Studies Saida Grundy.

I could be wrong, but I believe that in reaffirming the university’s stance against racially charged language and attitudes, President Brown quite clearly calls Saida Grundy a racist.

I have not read all of Saida Grundy’s tweets, but at least in those that I have read, I don’t believe that she has stigmatized any specific living individuals as racists.

Apparently, negotiating one’s way around highly charged language that might be deemed offensive is considerably more treacherous than it might seem as if it ought to be.


Boston University Office of the President

One Silber Way

Boston, Massachusetts 02215

T 617-353-2200 F 617-353-3278

May 12, 2015


To the Boston University Community:


Many members of our community are aware of comments made on social media by Dr. Saida Grundy, who on July 1st will become an assistant professor in the Department of Sociology with an additional appointment in African American Studies.

Dr. Grundy’s comments are receiving extensive coverage in the media; we are also hearing from alumni, friends, and others about them. Many have expressed the view that some of Dr. Grundy’s comments are offensive and/or racist.

At Boston University, we acknowledge Dr. Grundy’s right to hold and express her opinions. Our community is composed of faculty, staff, and students who represent widely varying points of view on many sensitive issues.

At the same time, we fully appreciate why many have reacted so strongly to her statements. Boston University does not condone racism or bigotry in any form, and we are committed to maintaining an educational environment that is free from bias, fully inclusive, and open to wide-ranging discussions. We are disappointed and concerned by statements that reduce individuals to stereotypes on the basis of a broad category such as sex, race, or ethnicity. I believe Dr. Grundy’s remarks fit this characterization.

I do not say this lightly or without a great deal of consultation and soul-searching. I understand there is a broader context to Dr. Grundy’s tweets and that, as a scholar, she has the right to pursue her research, formulate her views, and challenge the rest of us to think differently about race relations. But we also must recognize that words have power and the words in her Twitter feed were powerful in the way they stereotyped and condemned other people. As a university president, I am accustomed to living in a world where faculty do—and should—have great latitude to express their opinions and provoke discussion. But I also have an obligation to speak up when words become hurtful to one group or another in the way they typecast and label its members. That is why I weigh in on this issue today.

Too often conversations about race quickly become inflamed and divisive. We must resolve to find a vocabulary for these conversations that allows us to seek answers without intemperance, rancor, or unnecessary divisiveness. We expect our faculty members to strive to create this environment in their classrooms.

I also understand that some members of our faculty believe that any equivocation by the president is tantamount to not supporting a new colleague. To those who feel that way, I ask that we talk rather than jump to conclusions. I recognize this is a difficult issue and I welcome the chance to talk with all of you and Dr. Grundy about it.

Only when we hold these conversations will we—as an academic community, with our educational programs, research, and scholarship—meet the standards we set for ourselves.



Robert A. Brown



3 thoughts on “Saida Grundy’s Tweets: The Institutional Response

    • That was certainly my first impression, yes. It’s possible, I suppose to go with proximity and read it as him calling her remarks as engaged in stereotyping, rather than her being a racist.

      The broader point, I feel, is that the president ignores/downplays the value of her serving a community good by being a public intellectual and stirring the pot to force discussion of issues of the day.

      • As a B.U. grad, this is progress. Under President Silber, he would have fired her as he tried so many times to fire Dr Howard Zinn. President Brown does not impose sanctions or threaten actions against Grundy; he is addressing the university’s commitment to diversity and, while responding to external pressure, does not cravenly surrender to it. Unlike the University of Illinois that fired Steven Salaita for presumptive accusations of teaching bias against Jewish students, B.U. does not capitulate to those who claim the provocative Grundy would be partial to non-white students. Absent proof of classroom misconduct, such charges should never derail and appointment or conduce non-renewal. B.U., not the University of Illinois, has, thus far, acted in a responsible manner.

Your comments are welcome. They must be relevant to the topic at hand and must not contain advertisements, degrade others, or violate laws or considerations of privacy. We encourage the use of your real name, but do not prohibit pseudonyms as long as you don’t impersonate a real person.