More from PROFS on the Assault on Tenure in Wisconsin

In a post yesterday entitled “The End of Tenure in Wisconsin?” I discussed proposals approved last week by the Wisconsin Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee that would remove tenure protections from statute, weaken shared governance, and modify layoff policies and procedures for faculty.  While the University of Wisconsin Board of Regents will remain empowered to restore tenure protections through university policy — and they seem to have indicated a willingness to do so — the complicated layoff policies included in the lengthy Section 39 of the bill could, if approved as they stand by the full Legislature, eviscerate tenure in any situation deemed to involve financial difficulty.

As I quoted in that post, the basic principle enunciated is as follows:

Layoff due to budget or program decision: Modify current law to specify that the Board may, with appropriate notice, terminate any faculty or academic staff appointment when such an action is deemed necessary due to a budget or program decision regarding program  discontinuance, curtailment, modification, or redirection, instead of when a financial emergency exists as under current law.

Specify that the Board may layoff or terminate a tenured faculty member, or layoff or terminate a probationary faculty member prior to the end of his or her appointment, when such an action is deemed necessary due to a budget or program decision requiring program discontinuance, curtailment, modification, or redirection.

Yesterday, PROFS, a voluntary, non-profit membership organization of University of Wisconsin-Madison faculty, formed in 1976 by the Faculty Senate, which previously released a strong statement opposing the measures, issued a second statement detailing the dangers associated with Section 39.  The statement is worth quoting in full:

Statement by PROFS in response to JFC omnibus motion #521, item #39

June 2, 2015

Language in the omnibus motion for UW System approved by the Wisconsin legislature’s Joint Finance Committee on May 29 would fundamentally erode the concept of tenure at the University of Wisconsin, effectively allowing the UW Board of Regents to lay off any faculty or staff for virtually any reason. If such language is passed by the full Wisconsin legislature, it will cripple the UW’s ability to attract and retain quality employees, devalue the educational credentials of future UW graduates, and create new financial challenges for the UW System.

We have previously noted that the omnibus motion passed by the Committee contains a number of troubling items, including many that are clearly policy issues without budget implications. Of these, by far the most alarming is item #39, which would allow the Board of Regents to “terminate any faculty or academic staff…due to a budget or program decision regarding program discontinuance, curtailment, modification, or redirection.”

Under existing policy, program elimination accompanied by the layoff of tenured UW faculty can occur only in the case of financial exigency. Past UW administrators have noted that financial exigency is only invoked as a last resort, with the clear knowledge that such action will do lasting harm to the reputation of a university and to its ability to recruit faculty far into the future. By comparison, the item #39 provision casts the layoff decision in dangerously casual terms. Given legal cover by the vague terms “modification” and “redirection”, there could be no meaningful limit on the power of the Regents to dismiss faculty and/or to close programs or research centers that fell out of favor with administrators or political leaders.

It is above all the promise of academic freedom directly afforded by tenure that provides the fertile ground for independent scholarly inquiry. That promise would be rendered hollow by the provision in the omnibus motion on faculty and staff dismissals. The “fearless sifting and winnowing” central to the Wisconsin Idea would be no more.

While earlier proposed modifications to the UW, such as the public authority, were widely debated, the justification for, and consequences of, item #39 were not. The vote by the JFC was taken within hours of the omnibus motion being made public for the first time.
Wisconsin voters and the Wisconsin Legislature both deserve to understand what those consequences will be.

Specifically, it will become markedly more difficult to attract and retain outstanding faculty when the guarantee of tenure has been so thoroughly weakened. Salaries will have to increase to compensate for decreased job security, among other factors. Faculty who win the large external research grants that make up more than 30% of the UW-Madison budget (as compared to the 17% from the state) will depart, and budget problems will be exacerbated. Economic benefits to Wisconsin will be lost. Above all, UW students will lose access to the best teachers, researchers, and scholars in the field.

The potential loss of institutional quality is so dramatic that it could endanger future accreditation from the Higher Learning Commission, which in turn would imply loss of student access to federal financial aid. The UW System will also be at risk of being placed on the American Association of University Professors Censure List, which would drastically weaken our ability to attract and retain faculty.

Ultimately, the bond between Wisconsin families and the UW System will be undermined when the System can no longer promise to provide their children with a first-rate education. Out-of-state students who increasingly subsidize the cost of in-state tuition will have little incentive to pay a premium for a devalued degree.

Given the consequences that this profound weakening of tenure would have, we call on our state representatives to take common-sense, fiscally prudent, and necessary steps to eliminate this non-fiscal provision and thereby protect a world-class institution that has served Wisconsin taxpayers extremely well for 167 years.

2 thoughts on “More from PROFS on the Assault on Tenure in Wisconsin

  1. Pingback: The End of Tenure in Wisconsin? | As the Adjunctiverse Turns

  2. Pingback: My Congressional Comment | The Academe Blog

Your comments are welcome. They must be relevant to the topic at hand and must not contain advertisements, degrade others, or violate laws or considerations of privacy. We encourage the use of your real name, but do not prohibit pseudonyms as long as you don’t impersonate a real person.