What Is the Point of “Re-Branding” if the New Brand Is Not Unique?

New University of Akron President Scott Scarborough announced in May that the school was being rebranded as “Ohio’s polytechnic university.” He justified the change by asserting that the university “needs a new, distinct identity to attract students and survive in the future.”

But, according to an article by Rick Armon published in the Akron Beacon-Journal, “the University of Akron isn’t the only college going polytechnic”:

“Purdue University last month approved changing the name of its College of Technology to the Purdue Polytechnic Institute.

“And Washington State University Tri-Cities in Richland, Wash., wants to add the word polytechnic as a descriptor for its campus.

“Both institutions say the branding works well with the changing economy.

“’It incorporates innovative learning environments, integrates humanities with technical studies in a learn-by-doing atmosphere, and offers new options for majors and for earning a degree,’ Gary Bertoline, dean of the Purdue Polytechnic Institute, said in a prepared statement.”

This is all well and good, but the word “polytechnic” has actually been part of some university names for a very long time. In fact, quite ironically, the name of the third largest university in Virginia was changed to Virginia Polytechnic University in 1944, but for a long while, just about everyone has preferred to call the university Virginia Tech. Somehow I don’t think that Akron Tech or even Ohio Tech has the same ring to it.

So this story illustrates several truisms about administrative brainstorms:

1. What is presented as new or innovative, is almost never either but, instead, something that is either recycled or imitative, or both.

2. What is presented as a “difference maker” almost never makes any substantive difference and, in fact, very often produces almost the opposite of the intended result.

Rick Armon’s complete article can be found at: http://www.ohio.com/news/local/university-of-akron-not-only-college-going-polytechnic-1.596372

 

3 thoughts on “What Is the Point of “Re-Branding” if the New Brand Is Not Unique?

  1. What a blast from the past. Virginia Tech was called VPI or Virginia Polytechnic Institute for the longest time until the 1970s when the university added the clunky “and State University” to the end of their name because they feared that people out-of-state would think VPI was a trade school and not a research university. They also didn’t want to be confused with VMI (Virginia Military Institute). It was such a mouthful, VPI&SU, that in the late 90s and early 2000s, they rebranded to the simpler Virginia Tech to be like Georgia Tech (aka Georgia Institute of Technology). Funny how we’re returning to the past. Maybe Virginia Tech will go back to VPI, which in my opinion should have never been changed to begin with.

  2. Pingback: University of Akron Name Change Considered in an International Context | The Academe Blog

Your comments are welcome. They must be relevant to the topic at hand and must not contain advertisements, degrade others, or violate laws or considerations of privacy. We encourage the use of your real name, but do not prohibit pseudonyms as long as you don’t impersonate a real person.