Hindu American Foundation Statement

The Hindu American Foundation[i] (HAF) Board of Directors notes an anonymous[ii] posting on this blog site on September 16, 2015, ostensibly representing over one hundred scholars with expertise in South Asia that co-signed a statement[iii] also previously posted here.  After publicly calling for a debate and spirited conversation over the upcoming visit of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the posting reports emails to various signatories characterized as “harassment.” While we have not yet seen the nature of the emails, with discernible irony, the statement targets an unnamed board member of HAF reporting that, “Several letter signatories have also been targeted by a board even member of the Hindu American Foundation, another Hindu nationalist organization.”

We, as leaders of HAF, denounce the publication of this ad hominem attack on the Foundation, its board of directors and false affiliations to Indian nationalist organizations.  Neither HAF as an entity, nor any member of the HAF board, staff, or executive council has sought to contact any signatory of the South Asian faculty statement posted on August 27, 2015, in person, by email or otherwise.

As a 501 (c)(3) non-profit organization led by mostly American born Hindus, HAF consistently and categorically rejects the counterfactual insinuation that HAF is an affiliate or ideological bedfellow of any organization with existential ties to the political landscape in India, nationalist or otherwise.  While no advocacy organization can claim to represent the entirety of an inherently diverse American Hindu diaspora that numbers close to 2.5 million in the United States alone, HAF was the first grassroots advocacy organization representing Hindu Americans to create a professionalized model and gain recognition[iv] as the “first major national advocacy group looking at Hindu identity.”

After HAF’s founding in 2003, with the support of a national membership, HAF opened a permanent office in Washington, DC, and supports a full-time professional staff. Its Board, staff, Executive Council, local chapters, and membership represent Hindus of every race, nationality, ethnicity, race, caste, gender, and sexual orientation. HAF’s advocacy efforts are guided by the following stated objectives: 1) promote pluralism and mutual respect amongst peoples; 2) ensure an accurate understanding of Hinduism as a living tradition, including academia[v]; 3) highlight and secure the human rights through a widely acclaimed and cited human rights report[vi]; 4) represent the Hindu American community’s needs and interests to institutions influencing and making policy; 5) solve contemporary problems by applying Hindu philosophy; and 6) build a sustainable institution that will remain a pre-eminent advocate for Dharma communities for future generations.

HAF did join[vii] over three hundred professional, civic, cultural, as well as, Hindu, Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Sikh, and Jain organizations as “welcome partners” to facilitate distribution of tickets to the 45,000 Americans vying to attend a community reception for Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi later this month.  And for Mr. Modi’s previous visit to New York City, HAF liaised with community leaders and other major Indian American organizations to enable an unprecedented 33 Members of Congress and South Carolina’s Governor of Indian origin, Nikki Randhawa Haley, to attend the reception and meet with Mr. Modi.

All of HAF’s engagement with Mr. Modi, and more broadly in public policy and government relations pertinent to India, are predicated on a firm belief that dialogue between the United States and India is essential in today’s geopolitical climate, and that Hindu Americans — most of whom are of Indian origin — may serve as vital emissaries to foster an engagement based on understanding, trust, and mutual respect.  In contrast to this privileging of dialogue, however, the faculty statement posted here urged American businesses to be “mindful of not violating their own codes of corporate responsibility” implicitly warning against investment in India.

At no point did HAF disclose an institutional position, or release any statement in response to that faculty statement deploring Mr. Modi’s visit.  A member of the HAF board did, in an individual capacity, and with an explicit disclosure stating that his views were personal, offer[viii] his own experience with the faculty statement and its evolution.  The column details the author’s personal experiences interacting with, and even debating online[ix] and in person[x], a few of the signatories over dichotomous ideological positions on issues ranging from academic freedom to the stifling of free speech on campus in previous fora.

So while we unequivocally condemn — even empathize with electronic harassment having experienced the same when engaged in public advocacy — we do find disingenuous the claim that the faculty signatories actually seek debate, when they seem to vitiate dialogue by terming certain interrogations of their ideological positions, published works, and activism as “targeting” or “harassment.”

If debate and engagement on issues they raise is indeed the faculty signatories’ intention, we note that this forum has posted a categorical response[xi] specifically addressing every point that the faculty raised relative to Mr. Modi.  We also note that as recently as September 15, over 150 deans, department chairs, endowed professors and other faculty representing the diversity of disciplines in the academy–engineering, medicine, liberal arts, communications, business–released a statement  welcoming[xii] Mr. Modi’s visit and engaging issues such as the Digital India initiative that the original faculty statement offered dubious consideration.  Important aspects of the sought debate are most definitely constructive and ongoing, and we demand that ad hominems against the Foundation, and facile insinuations that proscribe rather than foster debate, cease immediately.

Sincerely,

Board of Directors of the Hindu American Foundation

Rishi Bhutada, Houston, Texas

Padma Kuppa, Troy, Michigan

Mihir Meghani, Fremont, California

Aseem Shukla, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

[i] www.hafsite.org

[ii] https://academeblog.org/2015/09/15/faculty-response-to-harssment-by-hindu-nationalist-organizations/

[iii] https://academeblog.org/2015/08/27/faculty-statement-on-modi-visit-to-silicon-valley/

[iv] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/28/nyregion/28yoga.html?_r=0

[v] http://www.hafsite.org/our-work/academia

[vi] http://www.hafsite.org/sites/default/files/HHR_Report_2014_Final.pdf

[vii] https://www.pmmodiinca.org/partners

[viii] http://swarajyamag.com/politics/the-illiberal-indian-left-an-anatomy-of-the-petition/

[ix] http://www.faithstreet.com/onfaith/2010/03/17/whose-history-is-it-anyways/2430

[x] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdL-tZz9uko

[xi] https://academeblog.org/2015/09/05/oppose-prejudice-and-fear-mongering-in-the-faculty-statement-on-narendra-modis-visit/

[xii] http://scroll.in/article/755786/full-text-second-group-of-us-professors-issues-letter-backing-modis-silicon-valley-trip

4 thoughts on “Hindu American Foundation Statement

  1. The FOIL does what it does best: shoot (I won’t say what since I am known to be so gentle of speech) and scoot. Probably typing away with one finger while picking their noses with the other, trying to compose the next Guest masterpiece of Schliarship: Their original one took only a month and half to compose, at a below-5th grade level of literacy and coherence, not to mention factual accuracy. To be immediately endorsed at A+ level by Professors of English claiming the good names of the University of Pennsylvania, and various New York, Florida and California Universities. Let me try helping them out with a good title for the next one.

    404 Scholars Protest the 350 Threatening and Insulting Posts Under Their Many Blogs at AAUP Forum. Bwaaaah!!! “Signed” by the 404 scholiars representing the cream of the South Asia/ Anthropology sewers. That’s not the number OF signors, just the number describing the signors.

  2. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND FREE SPEECH AT UNIVERSITIES.

    The professionalism of the Hindu American Foundation (HAF), its transparent activities, and it’s sincere mission are evident to everyone. [http://www.hafsite.org/]

    The Anti-Modi academics could learn a lot from the leaders and members of HAF. These reflexively Anti-Modi academics have a right to their opinion, but they do not have a right to misstate facts and malign honest people and organizations.
    This kind of action raises serious concerns about the academic integrity of the individuals. Hiding behind “anonymous blogs” and using the collective “we” seems like a craven abdication of a professor’s duty.

    Free speech and political speech have a very important place in America. However, when an academic uses his/her institutional title when exercising free speech, they incur a serious obligation to adhere to the rules of honest scholarship established by their institution. Each academic institution should enforce its standards of ethics after a proper investigation.

  3. It is illogical and disingenuous to call all supporters of Mr. Modi “Hindu Nationalists”. According to the respected Pew Research Center, this would make 87% of Indians in India “Hindu Nationalists”. (*see below)

    The Indian diaspora in America strongly supports Mr. Modi for many legitimate reasons related to good governance and economic development, which is so desperately needed in India. These Indian-Americans are not Hindu Nationalists, just concerned global citizens.

    *http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/09/17/indians-adore-modi/

  4. Pingback: South Asia Faculty Response to HAF Statement | The Academe Blog

Your comments are welcome. They must be relevant to the topic at hand and must not contain advertisements, degrade others, or violate laws or considerations of privacy. We encourage the use of your real name, but do not prohibit pseudonyms as long as you don’t impersonate a real person.