The Ohio Conference of AAUP Unanimously Endorses Resolution against Legislative Efforts to Restrict Textbook Options

This resolution is the first of four presented and unanimously endorsed at The Ohio Conference annual meeting on November 7.


Opposition to House Bill 160

Whereas the Ohio Conference AAUP has concerns over textbook costs;

Whereas House Bill 160 does not address how we might be able to control those costs;

Whereas the royalties that faculty collect from authoring texts is typically a small percentage, usually averaging around ten percent;

Whereas the protection of academic freedom is the core mission of the AAUP, and faculty should exercise the freedom to teach without fear of retribution;

Whereas faculty who teach at our state institutions of higher education are experts in their fields; therefore, to provide students with the highest quality of instruction, faculty should maintain the right to select the most appropriate texts, including those they have authored, as required course materials;

Whereas enactment of HB 160 would likely install an extra level of bureaucracy at our state universities and perhaps at the Ohio Department of Higher Education, therefore confounding further the problem of administrative growth;

Whereas government enters very dangerous territory, one that borders on censorship, when it starts to regulate which books can and cannot be assigned at our institutions of higher education;

Be it resolved that the Ohio Conference AAUP strongly opposes House Bill 160 and any efforts to control the textbooks that faculty can require as course materials.

2 thoughts on “The Ohio Conference of AAUP Unanimously Endorses Resolution against Legislative Efforts to Restrict Textbook Options

  1. Ohio House Bill 160 ( is a very disturbing piece of legislation. It bans professors from using textbooks for which they get any royalties, as well as any customized textbook (even if they get no profit from it). This is an absolute prohibition: even if a professor donated royalties from the books used in a class for student scholarships, the textbook is banned. Such a bizarre law would prevent faculty from developing their own textbooks to use in classes,

Your comments are welcome. They must be relevant to the topic at hand and must not contain advertisements, degrade others, or violate laws or considerations of privacy. We encourage the use of your real name, but do not prohibit pseudonyms as long as you don’t impersonate a real person.