SUBMITTED BY ANTHONY ALESSANDRINI
Issued jointly by the Professional Staff Congress Academic Freedom Committee and the Hunter College Committee on Academic Freedom; cosigned by the Queensborough Community College Academic Freedom Committee.
We write as CUNY scholars concerned with academic freedom to express our outrage at Governor Kathy Hochul’s interference in an academic job search at Hunter College and our chancellor’s capitulation to the governor’s call to remove previously approved and publicly shared advertisements of two positions in Palestine studies at Hunter from CUNY’s website.
The idea that any government official can tell a public university who it can and cannot hire, what it can and cannot teach, violates the most basic principles of academic freedom. The fact that CUNY’s chancellor is unwilling to uphold this very simple value of public higher education is unacceptable. At a moment when so many fields of study—from critical race studies to gender and transgender studies to the most fundamental scientific and social scientific research on climate change, social inequality, and reproductive health—are under attack, the words and actions of Governor Hochul, Chancellor Félix Matos Rodríguez, and Board of Trustees Chairperson William Thompson are incredibly dangerous. We demand that Chancellor Matos Rodríguez affirm the right of Hunter College to conduct these searches without further interference and reaffirm the principles of academic freedom that are the basis of all the work we do as public scholars and educators.
We also want to affirm three important points as scholars and educators concerned with academic freedom.
- There is absolutely no relationship or connection between the field of Palestine studies and antisemitism. Any attempts to draw such a connection are false, pernicious, and disingenuous forms of propaganda and intimidation. Such claims also show a deep disrespect for—and, indeed, a deep ignorance of—the work done by scholars in the field for many decades (to cite just one example, the Journal of Palestine Studies, a respected peer-reviewed scholarly journal, was founded over fifty years ago). We reject the notion that this field should be regarded differently than any other academic field. That includes the right of experts to carry out job searches free from external interference.
- Although this should go without saying, the particular terms in the job search description to which Governor Hochul objects—“settler colonialism,” “genocide,” and “apartheid”—are legitimate scholarly and pedagogical topics. Indeed, scholars in fields ranging from anthropology to environmental sciences to history to literary studies to sociology and beyond address these topics in their work every day. Scholars working in the field of Palestine studies have every right to do so as well. To suggest, as Chancellor Matos Rodríguez and Board Chairperson Thompson do, that scholarly work on such topics is “divisive, polarizing, and inappropriate” is simply absurd. Certainly such terms are not uncontested, but that is precisely why we study them. By failing to affirm this simple idea, our chancellor and board chairperson reveal a willful ignorance of the work we do every day as public scholars and educators and are abdicating their responsibility to protect the basis of public education at CUNY.
- Furthermore, academic inquiry has no responsibility to be “balanced” or “non-divisive.” The whole point of academic freedom is to allow scholars and students to freely analyze, discuss, and debate contested topics and issues. At its heart, academic freedom is based on the idea that a society benefits from this form of free intellectual inquiry—including (especially) around contested areas of study. After all, desegregated schools, women’s suffrage, and indeed universal public education itself were once “divisive, polarizing” topics. At this moment more than ever, the failure of CUNY’s leadership to affirm academic freedom endangers us all—especially our students who rely on us to foster the robust discussion of ideas in the classroom.
We reiterate our complete and unequivocal support for this cluster hire, and for our colleagues at Hunter College doing the crucial work of selecting future colleagues to carry out this important work in Palestine studies. We insist that the chancellor stop acquiescing to political pressure and allow this search to go forward without further interference. We urge the chancellor to join us, his fellow public scholars and educators, in opposing such egregious attacks on the principles of academic freedom.
We welcome other academic freedom organizations or formations at CUNY to cosign this statement. Please contact PSC-CUNY AFC Chair Tony Alessandrini at tonyalessandrini@gmail.com for more information.



“Genocide,” “settler colonialism,” and “apartheid” are NOT divisive terms?
So is “evolution”. The point was that “divisive” is not a legitimate grounds for elimination.
We are all adults here. Let’s not kid ourselves. The job posting was a not-too-subtle (transparent) attempt to find and hire a professor who embraces the notion that Israel is guilty of genocide, apartheid, settler colonialism, human rights [violations], etc., etc.
Sure, one can say that interpretation is not what the posting announces; one can say there is no such hidden intent here; and one can say it is just a garden variety ad trying to fill a need. One can also attempt to gaslight others.
Continuing the charade, one can even argue that each of the emotive topics in the ad is a worthy subject for scholarly research. And one can argue that academic freedom demands that no outside interference by politicians constrain what a university faculty wishes to study and teach. All individually true points. But, in full context and taken as a whole, those arguments about this specific job posting are somewhat disingenuous.
Unless blog readers have been living on another planet, everyone should be fully aware of the Gaza-Israel conflict and the multiple accusations that have been leveled against Israel.
So cutting to the chase, the honest question here is: Whether or not a state university’s ad that signals (dog whistles) it endorses an anti-Israel position on unproven, highly controversial, and libelous allegations can rightfully be subject to censorship by the governor.
While we all favor academic freedom, it does have limitations; and it is important to note that the governor is objecting to the specific wording of the ad and not what is taught in classrooms.
The simple fact here is that this ad – from a state school – can easily be interpreted to imply grotesque wrongdoing by Israel. And as such, it is patently offensive to a majority of the governor’s constituents, which, understandably, makes her decision to have it removed quite reasonable.
Does this nakedly anti-Israel ad deserve academic freedom protection? Hardly.